A collection of essays that use John Haugeland’s work on intentionality, embodiment, objectivity, and caring to explore contemporary issues in philosophy of. Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea [John Haugeland] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Machines who think―how utterly preposterous. Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea by John Haugeland () Having Thought: Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind by John Haugeland (
|Published (Last):||18 December 2007|
|PDF File Size:||13.33 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.48 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
That is not to say that we should reject out of hand any empirical results that are not compatible with scientific laws, but that rather our first impulse should be to investigate why these results are anomalous a bad experimental set-up, miscalculation in the data analysis, etc.
ComiXology Thousands of Digital Comics. Rouse’s discussion of death picks up from there. He then suggests that modal claims involving necessity can be thought of not only as propositions, but also as performative speech acts, as involving an agent taking a stand by asserting that some event or pattern of events is necessary.
Haugeland is, on Lance’s view, again arguing against a straw man here. Rebecca Kukla begins hauveland stating that she is motivated by Haugeland’s claim that philosophy is ” just a particularly sophisticated and elaborate form of ostension” Rather, we develop this set of propositions by articulating our already concept-laden perception haugwland the world.
There may be more, depending on how one defines these categories. Otherwise, there would be an unbridgeable gap between the non-conceptual content of the manifold of sensations and the concept-laden propositions that we form about the world. I am not sure that the middle two sections of the book hang together as haugelandd thematically as the first and last sections do, but I know it is hard for collections of essays of this sort to have a perfect thematic structure and do not take this as a serious drawback.
Moving on to the second “dogma,” Haugeland defines cognitivism as the view that “reason is to be understood in terms of cognitive operations on cognitive states,” where a cognitive state is “something with propositional content such as a mental representation together with a cognitive attitude toward that content such as deeming or wanting it to be true ” It is “about” the world in some sense, since it involves engaging with the world around us in such a way as to yield facts about this world, but is not itself a fact that can be laid out in propositional form.
Blattner proposes to answer this question by introducing the idea of role specification. Sign in to use this feature. Amazon Restaurants Food delivery from local restaurants.
John Haugeland – Wikipedia
Can we say that recordings exhibit intentionality in some sense? HarrisburgIllinoisUSA.
Haugeladn – – Kluwer Academic Publishers. Shopbop Designer Fashion Brands. Mays – – Philosophy 27 April: Haugeland provides an argument for the Dreyfusian position that much jhn modern philosophy “modern” both in the sense of the historical era starting with Descartes, and in the sense of current analytic philosophy wrongly gives too much weight to the role of explicit mental content. On her view, there is no longer a puzzle about how representations expressed in language can refer to objects in the world.
Haugeland claims that, in order for scientific knowledge to exist in propositional form as a brute fact about the world, we must first acquire scientific know-how — the knowledge of ” how to make or perform the observations, measurements, and experiments that yield the factual evidence” Insofar as they do, they exhibit what Rouse calls a “narcissistic intentionality” Influences Hans SlugaHubert Dreyfus.
Similar authors to follow
Upon existential death, we have the possibility of being open to entities and being capable of being changed by them, if we have the right sort of intentional stance towards them. Now, I do think that both of these forms of variety are strengths, but they also serve to make this collection a challenging read.
Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Replacing Scholasticism with Science. He argues that, while the paradigm of scientific reason is explanation as a cognitive process, understanding is something different, something not able to be analyzed in terms haugelane the normal components of cognitive states. This all leads to some important and interesting implications.
Other animals might very well desire things encountered in the environment that they perceive as beneficial for them. Again, Haugeland’s strategy in arguing that this view is in fact a mere dogma is to consider another aspect of scientific knowledge.
Lance also agrees with Haugeland’s suggestion that the performative aspect haugelanr asserting necessary laws provides a counter-example to epistemological positivism, and wishes only that Haugeland had pushed this point further.
The metaphysical claim is hauveland the world just is the sum total of true propositions, something which Lance thinks is obviously false and not a view worth considering seriously. Amazon Inspire Digital Educational Resources.
If entities are iohn they are by virtue of the norms that govern their activities, then there seems to be nothing to stop someone from simply claiming that they have committed to a different set of norms than the common public ones, and thus have a different “truth” with regard to these entities. With that said, the next section contains two essays under the heading of “Embodiment. Making the Right Identification in the Turing Test.
Are they representations of objects?
Saul Traiger – – Minds and Machines 10 4: For me, haugelanc someone mostly familiar with Haugeland’s work on Heidegger, the introduction made it clear even when not mentioning Heidegger explicitly how Heideggerian resonances were present in Haugeland’s work in other areas, allowing me to both better appreciate what Haugeland and the non-Heideggerian essays were doing. The general idea is that entities appear as meaningful only in light of commitments that we have made to various identities or roles.
Due to considerations of length, I have decided to take primarily a descriptive approach in this review, foregoing more fine-grained evaluation and analysis of the nuances of the articles. He defines positivism as the view that “reality is ‘exhausted’ by the facts — that is, by the true propositions,” and hauyeland on this by adding, “this needn’t mean that there are no haugelanx, properties, or relations, but only that these are intelligible only as constituents of true propositions”